Resources & Media
Overview
This page is your go-to hub for factual information, downloadable materials, press coverage, and ways to share our message.
Everything here is designed to help you stay informed, share with neighbors, and speak confidently about why Cherry Creek North is saying NO to the GID.
Click Below to See Latest News Story Highlighting Our Neighborhood Victory!
CONSESSION HIGHLIGHTS
Click to Read Councilwoman Sawyer’s Formal Concession!
Former Councilman Wayne New has been on the front lines of communication ensuring the residents of Cherry Creek North are heard. Read his most recent exchanges leading up to the concession.
Click Above to Listen to the Neighbor’s VOTE!
- Dave B. Kicking Off the Meeting
- Jim Johnson Weighs in at minute 2:38
- Jim Johnson Boldly Asking for a Vote at minute 4:32
- Jamie Giellis Response at minute 8:45
Resources from the September 9th Emergency Planning Session
Thank you to the 96 neighbors who joined us for the September 9th Stop the GID Emergency Planning Session. Your presence and energy were a powerful reminder that Cherry Creek North stands united against the proposed GID.
For those who could not attend — and for anyone who wants to review and share the information — we’ve made all key materials available below.
- Presentation Slides (PDF)
A full copy of the slides presented at the Sept 9th meeting, covering the GID proposal, looming timelines, and strategies for unified opposition. - Detailed Resources & Hyperlinks
A comprehensive list of references, documents, and background materials with direct links for deeper reading and fact-checking.
Why These Resources Matter
- Ensure every neighbor has accurate, fact-based information.
- Share with friends and CCN residents who may be just learning about the GID.
- Prepare for the upcoming Bromwell Elementary meeting on Sept 16th, where we must show up informed, united, and ready.
Send Your Letter to the Board
One of the most effective ways to make your voice heard is to contact the board directly. We’ve made it easy for you by gathering letters and examples from neighbors who have already spoken out.
Use these letters as a starting point — personalize them with your own experiences, concerns, and perspective, or copy and paste them as they are. Every message counts, and the more they hear from us, the harder we are to ignore.
Tip: Keep your message respectful, factual, and to the point — but make it clear where you stand.
Official Responses to Resident Letter
Our neighbors have been writing directly to City officials and consultants to demand answers about the GID. We believe in transparency, so we’re publishing those exchanges here for everyone to read.
Most recently, Paid City Consultant, Jamie Geillis responded to a resident’s detailed letter about the GID process. You can read her full reply — and judge for yourself whether our voices are being respected.
Downloadable GID Fact Sheet
Media & Press Coverage
Denver Gazette
Published July 12, 2025
Glendale Cherry Creek Chronicle
Published July 24, 2025
CBS News Colorado
Published & Aired on August 9, 2025
The Kim Monson Show
Aired on August 15, 2025 (Stop the GID in CCN Story begins at 01:15:37)
Cherry Creek North Neighborhood Association
Recorded Meetings & Slideshows
Link to CCNNA GID Page: CCN General Improvement District (GID)
May 20th | CCNNA Residents Meeting – Presentation by Amanda Sawyer and Jamie Geilles
May 20th | CCNNA Residents Meeting – PowerPoint from Presentation
July 22nd | Cherry Creek General Improvement District (GID) Feasibility Report Presentation
Link to Zoom Recording: Cherry Creek General Improvement District (GID) Feasibility Report Presentation – Zoom
July 22nd | Cherry Creek General Improvement District (GID) Feasibility Report Presentation PowerPoint
Survey & Data
Flawed, Filtered, and Ignored: The GID Survey Was Never Valid
The city claims the GID proposal is based on community input, but the survey was anything but reliable. Over 210 responses were flagged as fake and removed after being traced to bots and duplicate IP addresses. Out of the remaining responses, only 354 individuals completed the survey in full — a fraction (less than 5% to be exact) of TOTAL surveyed residents.
Even more concerning, dozens of respondents were disqualified for not living or owning property in the area, yet the city still uses this data to push the GID forward. Despite low participation, manipulated inputs, and overwhelming skepticism, officials are treating the results as a mandate. It’s not community-driven — it’s manufactured consent.
The Numbers Don’t Lie — The Survey Fails Basic Standards of Validity
Despite being used to justify the GID, the city’s own data shows that 8 out of 10 target groups did not meet the minimum threshold for statistical validity. Only two segments — “All Residential Owners” and “Residential Renters” — reached the response rate needed for a valid survey at a 5% margin of error with 95% confidence.
The remaining groups, including Cherry Creek North residents and business owners, fell well below the bar. This means the conclusions being drawn from the survey are mathematically unreliable and deeply misleading. Using this flawed data to justify “continuing the GID feasibility process” is not responsible nor understandable, especially with 65% of survey participants voted NOT INTERESTED IN THE GID.
65% of Residents Said NO to the GID Tax — But It’s Being Forced Anyway
The city claims the GID proposal is based on community input, but the survey was anything but reliable. Over 210 responses were flagged as fake and removed after being traced to bots and duplicate IP addresses. Out of the remaining responses, only 354 individuals completed the survey in full — a fraction (less than 5% to be exact) of TOTAL surveyed residents.
Even more concerning, dozens of respondents were disqualified for not living or owning property in the area, yet the city still uses this data to push the GID forward. Despite low participation, manipulated inputs, and overwhelming skepticism, officials are treating the results as a mandate. It’s not community-driven — it’s manufactured consent.
Cherry Creek North Said No — Respect Our Boundaries
We are not speaking for Cherry Creek East or the BID. If other neighborhoods wish to pursue a General Improvement District, that is their decision. But the data makes one thing clear: Cherry Creek North overwhelmingly opposes the GID.
With 65.53% of CCN respondents not interested, and fewer than 9% expressing strong support, our neighborhood has made its position known. We are simply asking to be removed from this process and respected as a distinct voice. Forcing Cherry Creek North into a taxing district it clearly rejects is unacceptable — and it must stop now.
Have Questions? Want to Get Involved?
Fill out the form below and a member from our team will reach out to you soon!